Close Panel

30

Jun

2009

Winner!

By Miss KissThis. Posted in Contest, Update | No Comments »

Thank you to all of the wonderful people who participated in Name That Sex Toy! Thanks to you guys, it was a huge success. I was surprised by the number of correct lists sent in, and had to use the List Randomizer to pick the winner.

Pepper Honeywood of Peppered Honey is the official winner, so congrats Pepper! I want to recognize all of you awesome folks who correctly named my sex toys, so here are my honorable mentions:

In case you were wondering, here are the answers:

  1. Tantus Alumina Motion
  2. Vixskin Orbit
  3. Topco Cyberglass Four-Way G
  4. Tantus Echo
  5. Happy Valley Tom Putt
  6. Lelo Gigi
  7. Cal Exotics Silicone Slims G-Teaser
  8. Don Wands Blue Ripple with LED
  9. Cal Exotics Xtreme Pack G-Spot Bullet
  10. Njoy Pure Wand

Another big thank you to everybody who entered. Please keep an eye open for my very first sponsered contest, happening sometime in July!

 

If you follow Epiphora, which I’m sure many of you do, you have no doubt heard about the Don Wands snafu. I’m not going to cover that here, since Epiphora has done a wonderful job of explaining the situation herself.

I was not planning on writing a post about this, and did not want to turn it into a bigger deal than it already was… until now. I e-mailed the company last night, stating my disappointment, and have just received back a response that shows me exactly how little they care for their customers. I am appalled, and I have decided to post everything here to let everybody decide for themselves.

First, I’ll start off by showing you my e-mail:

Dear Don Wands:
 
I am writing in regards to an incident, which I’m sure you are aware of by now, regarding comments made to a fellow sex toy reviewer. On her review of a Treeze vibrator (review), a representative of your company made several unprofessional and condescending remarks regarding her honest opinion of the product. I am disappointed with the way this situation was handled, and it has tarnished my views of your company.
 
In the past, I have written two reviews of Don Wands products (Blue Ripple with LED and Vibrating Cobalt Nubby) in which I praised your products, as well as your company. Had this situation been handled in a more appropriate manner, I would have continued to support Don Wands and recommend your products. Instead, I will no longer be reviewing or purchasing your products, and will not hesitate to point consumers to different manufacturers in the future. I sincerely hope that Epiphora receives an apology for the way she was responded to and that this sort of incident is not repeated.
 
Your once loyal customer,
 
Miss KissThis

I expected to receive the standard “we apologize” e-mail in response, but what I saw in my inbox this morning blew me away. Here’s their response:

Thanks for your previous work. Alphabitch was incorrect in her characterization, if this is the reason, we are sorry you feel this way. I hope you change your mind as our efforts are researched and for the benefit of the consumer. I hope you see our goal without bias.

Our remarks were in response to several negative remarks toward the company and our efforts, not the review of the features of the products. Thanks for your past reviews, again we apologize if you were offended.

Kind Regards

Excuse me?? First of all, I was discussing EPIPHORA. They continue to place all blame on everyone else, saying someone “incorrectly characterized” things, instead of owning up to a crappy product and an even crappier business sense. They obviously did not actually read my e-mail, or they would have seen that the review of the product is not what caused me to view their company in a negative light. If I’m interested in a product, I will most likely still be interested whether there are negative reviews or not. The snarky response she got back is what tarnished my views (only to be furthered by their subsequent responses), and they only seem interested in defending their poor behavior while placing all blame on Epiphora.

They also claim Epiphora made several negative remarks towards the company and its efforts. Excuse me Don Wands, can you show me where? Epiphora simply pointed out the flaws of your PRODUCT, so no, the remarks were not directed towards your company nor your efforts. But now mine are, so congratulations.

Don’s “apology” (if that’s what you want to even call it) on Epiphora’s post furthers the reason why I will no longer support Don Wands.

Epiphora and your readers,

Please accept my apologies for the poorly worded defense of our efforts to bring a new product to market for the consumer.

We are making attempts to correct all negative comments in the review, however the fever that has ensued over a few poorly worded sentences is a bit much. Please accept that nothing personal was meant by the comments and we accept responsibility for your feelings.

Thank you for the honesty in your comments, we hope you understand that we did not mean to come off condescending. We are here for your feedback and questions as you move forward on a review, we hope you choose to find out more about the product.

The market and our research actually have found much a different story than much of the comments posted as of recent, they are moving quite well. We do plan on improvements and fixes for those who find one that is too noisy.

With Respect,
Don

It’s amazing that he can call the “fever” that ensued a “bit much” considering his previous comments. It surprises me that a company thinks consumers will not notice poor treatment or react to it. The poor impression he made will leave an impact on people besides Epiphora, and you would think a company would understand that. Please take some lessons in public relations and marketing Don, you really need it.

Again, he refers to the market and his research, further alienating anyone who DOESN’T like his product. Excuse me Don, nobody ever said that the Treeze line wasn’t selling well. As Epiphora herself has pointed out, there have been many positive reviews of the products. Your desperate attempts to defend the Treeze line only make me think less of you and your company. I don’t accept your apology, and I believe you’re only backpedaling to try and repair the damage you have caused.

I am surprised that a company such as Don Wands would have SUCH poor customer management and public relations skills. Like I said on Epiphora’s blog, there are better deserving companies out there that I would be much happier supporting. It’s only a matter of time before other companies begin producing similar products, and Don Wands can only hide behind their “innovative” designs for so long. You have lost my business, support, and respect Don Wands. Please stop underestimating and alienating your consumer base, or soon enough you won’t have one.

 

24

Jun

2009

HNT

By Miss KissThis. Posted in HNT | 12 Comments »

HNT

I’m quite tired today, and just as lazy, so I’m leaving you with a leftover pajama picture from 2 weeks back.

[If you were hoping for something sexier, the great Osbasso can lead you in the right direction!]
 

22

Jun

2009

Pleasurists #34

By Miss KissThis. Posted in Pleasurists | No Comments »

candles

from dockera.com via art or porn

Pleasurists is your round-up of the adult product reviews that came out in the last seven days from bloggers all around the sex blogosphere. Did you miss Pleasurists #33? Read it all here. Do you have a review for Pleasurists #35? Submit it here before Sunday June 28th at 11:59pm PDT. Please re-post this list on your own blog if listed.

Read more »

 

18

Jun

2009

HNT

By Miss KissThis. Posted in HNT | 13 Comments »

HNT

One of my most revealing HNT’s to date, and also one of my favorite.

Hope you enjoy, and please be sure to check out the rest at Views From The Back Row!

 

15

Jun

2009

Pleasurists #33

By Miss KissThis. Posted in Pleasurists | No Comments »

roses

from fotodigital.ro via art-or-porn

Pleasurists is your round-up of the adult product reviews that came out in the last seven days from bloggers all around the sex blogosphere. Did you miss Pleasurists #32? Read it all here. Do you have a review for Pleasurists #34? Submit it here before Sunday June 21st at 11:59pm PDT. Please re-post this list on your own blog if listed.

Read more »

 

14

Jun

2009

Name That Sex Toy!

By Miss KissThis. Posted in Contest, Pictures | 7 Comments »

I have a game for you! Are you ready?

It’s time for Name That Sex Toy, and to make things a little more fun I have decided to reward one lucky reader with a prize! To enter all you have to do is name the sex toy in each photo, and e-mail me your list at ms.kissthis(at)gmail.com by 11:59 pm (PST) on June 26th. Whoever gets the most answers correct will win a product of their choice (up to $20) courtesy of yours truly. In the event of a tie, I will choose a winner using the List Randomizer on random.org.

Note: To maintain my identity, as well as yours, the winner must have (or be willing to create) a wishlist on EdenFantasys.com. I will contact the winner on June 27th, and then the winner must send me a link to their EF wishlist and the name of the desired product. Must be 18 (or 21 in some states) and over to enter. Limited to US residents only. (Sorry my international friends!)

Ready, set, GO!

-1-#1

 

-2-
#2

 

-3-#3

 

-4-
#4

 

-5-
#5

 

-6-
#6

 

-7-
#7

 

-8-#8

 

-9-
#9

 

-10-
#10

 

Feel free to spread the word, and please keep an eye out for my first sponsored contest coming up in July!

 

14

Jun

2009

Spring Cleaning

By Miss KissThis. Posted in Pictures, Random | 2 Comments »

It’s dildos-in-the-dishwasher day at my house, and you know what that means… more dildo pictures!

Dildos!

 Mmm, dildos on the counter. (Yes, I do lay sex toys on my counters and take pictures. I’m totally sane, I assure you.)

Dildos in the dishwasher

 Yay! Clean dildos!

Have I said “dildo” enough for you in this post? No? DILDO DILDO DILDO. You’re welcome.
(P.S.  I have a fun game planned soon. AND a contest. Are you exctied??)

 

12

Jun

2009

Cal Exotics Intimacy Massager

By Miss KissThis. Posted in Pictures, Review, Vibrator.com, Video | 12 Comments »

When I first learned I would be getting the Intimacy Massager by California Exotics from Vibrator.com, I was really excited. If you know me, you know I’m head-over-heels in love with my Eroscillator 2. I thought the Intimacy Massager could possibly be a cheaper alternative and that I might be able recommend it to those not wanting to shell out big bucks for a vibrator. Unfortunately for me and those on a budget, I won’t be recommending this product anytime soon.

I had hope for the Intimacy Massager, I really did. I even tried to look past the oh-so-typical California Exotics packaging, which boasts a busty blonde and some dude with a goatee. (What does that even have to do with anything? Let’s try to be a little more relevant next time Cal Exotics.) Speaking of relevancy, can we talk about the name for a minute? “Intimacy Massager”  …really? This thing isn’t intimate, stop trying to fool us. But I digress… I slightly winced at the packaging’s claim of “4 silicone heads” since they’re made out of TPR, not silicone. The box says “Hi-Speed Oscillating Massager” and “More Power”, and I sure hoped it was telling the truth. Sadly, it was just another lie Cal Exotics wanted me to believe.

Intimacy MassagerOk, let’s back up and make some formal introductions. Intimacy Massager, meet readers. Readers, meet Intimacy Massager. The I.M. differentiates itself from other clitoral stimulators with its oscillation, which is a back-and-forth movement that is more similar to the movement of fingers than regular vibrations are. (Part of the reason I love the Eroscillator 2 so much is because of its oscillation, and the fact that it doesn’t make me numb.) There are four attachments, “heads” if you will, made out of bright pink TPR that easily snap onto the main body. They each have a different texture, with obvious seams that run up one side and down the other. The main body of the vibrator is metallic silver, and features a shape which I assume is supposed to make it easy to hold. The shape utterly fails in that aspect, and instead makes holding the I.M. while masturbating somewhat awkward and uncomfortable. It takes 3 AAA batteries, which load right into the bottom. I have a bone to pick with the battery compartment: I hate it. Instead of being a twist off or any other normal battery compartment design, you just pull the bottom cap right off. Seems pretty easy, that is until you have to get the damn thing back on. There is a little groove-and-nub thing which you have to line up, and it’s all way too frustrating for something that should be so simple.

The oscillations are controlled by a pink push-button on the bottom (right on the finicky battery cap). The Intimacy Massager only has two settings, compared to the Eroscillator 2’s three. I honestly don’t notice much of a difference in power between the two settings, other than the higher-pitched whine of the high setting. Instead of the head moving side-to-side, much like the Eroscillator 2 does, the head on the I.M. twists back and forth, which made me a little disappointed. While the Eroscillator 2 is rather quiet, the Intimacy Massager makes far too much noise for something that is so dinky. At first it would appear as if the I.M. was decently powerful… and then you touch the head to something and it STOPS. I can have it on full power, touch my finger to it, and put a small amount of pressure and the head starts slowing down and then will completely stop moving.

In my opinion, having a vibrator stop doing what it’s supposed to under a minimal amount of pressure is unforgiveable. Pressure is necessary for me to come, so getting off with this toy was a challenge. After half an hour of struggling with it, and using hardly any pressure at all so it would keep “oscillating”, I finally managed to have a single (unfulfilling) orgasm, but by that time I was so frustrated that I didn’t care. If you don’t need pressure, there’s a slight chance the Intimacy Massager could work for you. For me, it was just disappointment after disappointment.

If you want to see the Intimacy Massager suck under pressure, please watch the video below. (For reference I have shown the Eroscillator 2 and its performance. Please note that the Eroscillator 2’s movements are very subtle when compared to the I.M., so while it doesn’t look like it’s doing much it actually is.)

As much as I had wanted to tell you all to run out and get the California Exotics Intimacy Massager, I just won’t. Vibrator.com has tons of other (better) sex toys, and I’m sure you could find exactly what you’re looking for. I whole-heartedly recommend the Xtreme Pack G-Spot Bullet (Cal Exotic’s saving grace), which is nearly the same price of the Intimacy Massager and about a thousand times better.

 

11

Jun

2009

HNT

By Miss KissThis. Posted in HNT | 16 Comments »

HNT